Jean Machine Canada: Second Yoga Jeans Were $130 | Now $54 & Free Shipping

Jean Machine Canada: Second Yoga Jeans Were $130 | Now $54 & Free Shipping

PicMonkey Collage

Want some super comfortable jeans? Second Yoga Jeans are supposed to be amaze-balls in that they fit so perfectly and are very flattering. These jeans are normally over $100 and Jean Machine has a few different pairs on for only $59.99. Add our exclusive coupon code BARGAINMOOSE to get another 10% off your order, bringing these jeans down to $53.99. Right now they've got free shipping on all orders, which is a nice bonus on top of the 50% plus extra 10% off you are getting.

Even more awesome is that the jeans are made in Canada, which I do find important, as shopping locally is best for our economy and our environment. I love these highrise ankle jeans with zips in white. I know it is past Labour Day, but you can wear white any time of year, I believe! The ankle zips make a plain white jean have a little more style too. I found the same jeans selling for a whopping $135 at Shop Girls. I think I'm going to get a pair of these for myself! These are regularly $119.99.

If you are into a ripped look and more of a midrise than a highrise, these black jeans with a ripped knee, will be right up your alley. These are a bit of a better deal, regularly $129.99 and make the deal that much better, saving you $87! I found Second Yoga jeans selling at a few different stores, including Amazon, where they aren't less than $85. With what you are saving here, you can get yourself another pair or two.

Our exclusive works on anything on Jean Machine's site, so I would also take a look at the women's sale section and get myself a top to go along with my new jeans. For only $13.50 after coupon code, I can get this long line tank with a side slit, with a regular price of $29.99. If I really wanted a hot deal, I could just get the top on its own because of the no minimum free shipping, but the jeans are just too good of a deal to pass up!

(Expiry: Unknown)

Comments

Reply to