Sears Canada: Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid | Was $200 Now $100

Sears Canada: Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid | Was $200 Now $100

R2D2

Now this would be the ultimate gift for any Star Wars fan! At this time, Sears is having a great sale on this Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid - you can get 50% off the retail price! This fantastic piece of interactive Star Wars merchandise normally sells for $199.99, but you can now pick up this awesome R2-D2 for just $99.99! Plus, you'll also qualify for free shipping! Is 100 dollars the right price to make someone have a fantastic Christmas memory for many years to come? I think it is!

The Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid has some really cool features! This R2-D2 figure responds to voice commands, and can even "dance", play music, react to famous Star Wars characters, and so much more! You can even play some games with this interactive R2-D2, and it also has a sweet light beam, sound processing microphones for voice commands, and infra-red location sensors - this way, R2-D2 can find and follow you!

This Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid even has a secret storage compartment, a droid mood status indicator, and a rotating dome. You can put R2-D2 in sentry mode to guard your stuff, and you could even swing down its utility arm so it can hold beverages for you - wouldn't you want R2-D2 to bring you a nice refreshing can of Coke, or even a beer? Now that's cool!

If you wanted to buy this Star Wars R2-D2 Interactive Astromech Droid from Toys R Us, it would cost you $149.97, and it's $158.98 US if you buy it from an American WalMart location. I've included a snippet of a review of this device from a satisfied WalMart customer below:

The robot works splendid! It takes a few times to get it to understand you but once you understand how to work with it, it's worth the money. It's definitely something to collect if you're a Star Wars fan.

May the force be with you, and happy hunting!

(Expiry: 23rd November 2014)

Comments

Reply to