Costco Canada: $110 Off Oreck DualMax Air Purifier - Now Just $290 (Reg. $400)

Costco Canada: $110 Off Oreck DualMax Air Purifier - Now Just $290 (Reg. $400)

costco-oreck-air-purifier

With winter almost over, we will be entering spring season and if you have allergies, then prevention is definitely key! During a couple of days only, you can save $110 off the Oreck DualMax air purifier at Costco Canada. Regularly priced at $399.99, you can get it for just $289.99.

With 3 fans that work to absorb dirt and air impurities, this purifier is particularly great for anyone suffering from allergies. In fact, here's what one reviewer had to say about it on Amazon's site:

5 stars because its beautiful and easy to plug in. My allergies are gone and boy does this thing suck the dirt out of the air. You can tell that even the tiniest particles are being filtered out. Works IF* you don't have an arc protector circuit in your bedroom. The ALCI interrupter will have to be bypassed with a surge protector strip, which is what I did and it works fine. Low speed it is quiet. High speed, it is LOUD. Will update how my allergies and 4 am sneezing reacts to this puppy being in the room. Love the fact that the filter is permanent, and has such a large cleaning surface area on the cell.

**** Been a few days now. My sneezing at 5 am is gone!!! It was back last night, when I realized my bedroom door was completely open, and closed it... perfect. My sinuses open up every time I'm in my room, and I cannot recommend this more. So glad I chose this over replaceable filter ones. So easy to clean. Simple to put back.

A quick price comparison also showed that Costco's deal is definitely the best out there right now since Oreck's own site is selling it for $399.99, The Shopping Channel has it for as high as $499.99 and Amazonis selling it for the lowest price of the bunch at $319.99 (but even then it's still $30 more expensive than Costco's offer).

As usual, shipping and handling is also absolutely free.

(Expiry: 2nd March 2014)

Comments

Reply to